Report EUTO Gap
22.10.2023

Global Tax Evasion Report 2024

Annette Alstadsæter, Sarah Godar, Panayiotis Nicolaides, Gabriel Zucman

Download PDF

Over the last 10 years, governments have launched major initiatives to reduce international tax evasion. These efforts include the creation of a new form of international cooperation long deemed utopian – an automatic, multilateral exchange of bank information in force since 2017 and applied by more than 100 countries in 2023 – and a landmark international agreement on a global minimum tax for multinational corporations, endorsed by more than 140 countries and territories in 2021.

Yet despite the importance of these developments, little is known about the effects of these new policies. Is global tax evasion falling or rising? Are new issues emerging, and if so, what are they? These questions are of tremendous importance in a context of rising income and wealth inequality, high public debt in the post-Covid-19 context, and large government revenue needs for addressing climate change and for funding health care, education, and public infrastructure.

This report addresses these issues thanks to an unprecedented international research collaboration and major data improvements. Prepared by the staff of the EU Tax Observatory – a research laboratory created in 2021 with unique expertise on international tax issues – this report summarizes work conducted by more than 100 researchers all over the world, often in partnership with tax administrations. This work leverages the availability of new data on the activities of multinational companies (such as country-by-country reports) and the offshore wealth of households (from the automatic exchange of bank information) created by the policy initiatives of the last decade. This report is the first systematic attempt at taking stock of this informational big bang.

We should make it clear at the outset that we do not restrict this report to the study of tax evasion in a narrow sense of fraud. Nor do we cover all forms of evasion, far from it. Our focus is on the issues that have been the focus of international policymaking over the last decade, the challenges posed by globalization for the taxation of multinational companies and high-net-worth individuals. Some of the practices we cover are clearly illegal – such as failing to report income earned on offshore bank accounts. Others are in a legal grey zone between avoidance and evasion – such as shifting profit to shell companies with no economic substance. Others are clearly legal, such as moving abroad to benefit from special tax regimes designed to attract wealthy individuals. All, however, allow the economic actors who have most benefited from globalization to reduce their tax rates to even lower levels, reducing government revenue, and increasing inequality. What is at stake in all cases is the question of the social sustainability of globalization and of modern tax systems.

We uncover positive evolution worth celebrating, but also setbacks, and major issues that remain unaddressed.

We make six proposals to address the issues identified in this report. A key proposal is to institute a global minimum tax on billionaires, equal to 2% of their wealth. We provide a first estimation of the revenue potential of this measure, showing that it would raise close to $250 billion (from less than 3,000 individuals) annually. A strengthened global minimum tax on multinational companies, free of loopholes, would raise an additional $250 billion per year. To give a sense of the magnitudes involved, recent studies estimate that developing countries need $500 billion annually in additional public revenue to address the challenges of climate change1 – needs that could thus be fully addressed by the two main reforms we propose. All proposals, including potential objections, are thoroughly detailed in Chapter 5.

A key message of this report is that tax evasion is not a law of nature but a policy choice. As interconnected nations we can choose free-for-all policies that allow it to fester, or we can choose coordination to curb it. It is also possible to make major progress through unilateral action, should ambitious global agreements fail.

Download PDF